Joe Monti

Tuesday, May 30, 2006

The EFF Action Center

I just wanted to say something about the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and their Action Center. The EFF is a non-profit group working to protect the digital rights of consumers. The government, bullied by the corporate world, is taking advantage of the digital rights of consumers. They do this through fear, misconceptions, and ignorance. And the EFF is a prominent group in the fight for your digital rights.

One of the many ways the EFF works to support your digital rights is the Action Center. The Action Center is a place where "you can contact your representatives on impending legislation that will have a direct effect on your civil liberties online." Contacting your legislators is a one of the more effective ways to have your voice heard and influence your rights as controlled by the government. And the Action Center provides a way to easily track and act on current legislation.

With the Action Center, you are given a list of current action items. If you see something you are interested in, click on it and you will go to a page with a summary of the item and a simple form to contact the appropriate senators/representatives. The EFF gives you a pre-made letter to express your interests or concerns to your representatives, so all you have to do is fill out your contact information. If you create an account, this information will be pre-filled each time you take action and you will also be able to edit the letter you are sending. The letter will be emailed or faxed depending on a few different things. You can also print and mail the letter. The EFF does just about everything for you; all you have to do is click a few buttons to have your voice heard.

Get involved in your government. You may not like them, but they have a lot of control over how you can use and what you can do with your electronics. They are supposed to be serving you, so let them know what you want. If you care about the issues, take a few minutes and check out the EFF Action Center. Alone we don't have much of a voice, but together we can be heard.

You may also want to sign up for the EFFector free email newsletter to keep up to date on the issues and be notified of new action alerts.

Saturday, May 20, 2006

eBay-ing my RC Racing stuff Pt.2: Truck

I've got another eBay auction up for my Team Losi XXX-T. We'll see how this one does.

The eBay auction can be found here.

Labels:

Thursday, May 18, 2006

eBay-ing my RC Racing stuff Pt.1: Charger

This is the first of maybe 4-5 eBay auctions in an effort to offload my RC car racing gear. I stopped racing almost 2 years ago when I moved to Dalton and never got back into it. I kept thinking I would, but I just don't have the time or extra money to dedicate to the hobby (that and my Friday nights are spoken for now).

This auction is for my Novak Millennium Pro charger, Trinity discharger, and power supply (converted from PC power supply). The power supply has some special meaning, since I'm pretty proud of what I was able to do with it, but I now have no need for it and I think it would help the auction.

I'll keep you appraised as I offer more of my RC collection.

The eBay auction can be found here.

Labels:

Wednesday, May 17, 2006

Update: Sun to open-source Java

SAN FRANCISCO -- Sun Microsystems Inc. at its JavaOne conference today announced that it would open-source Java but added that before it does so, company officials have to be certain the move won't lead to diverging paths in the code.

read more | digg story

Labels:

Friday, May 12, 2006

Where Software Patents and Free Software Collide

Like many of you, the idea of software patents makes my stomach churn. Not only that, but the USPTO grants software patents the way a hooker... well, you can see where this is going. It's not that I don't believe in due credit, or want to push my Free Software ideas on everyone, I just think the system is seriously flawed and Free Software is being unnecessarily hurt by it.

There are so many arguments why software patents are bad and don't get along with free software. Here are a few examples:
  • Software (and ultimately ideas) is not a commodity and cannot be bought or sold, and as such should not be patented. This is a very strict Free Software idea and not widely accepted by the non-believers.
  • Patentable ideas in software are too abstract and wide reaching, making them unnecessary and too difficult to track and enforce. This is a pretty solid argument. To a programmer, there are only so many ways you can do certain things, and some of these patented ideas restrict some basic operations. It just gets silly.
  • Software is in such a growth state that restrictive patents would restrict a crucial growth in society. There are many instances where the government has stepped in (in this case it would be out) to protected growth industries, and well, this is one of them.
  • Free Software is a right, much like free speech, and applying patent law to it is unethical. Wouldn't it suck if someone could patent the chant "hey ho, we won't go!"
  • And there may be instances where software patents would apply, particularly between businesses, but there is no reason why patented ideas in free software would diminish the value for the patent holder since free software is not profiting from the use of patents. And this counts for business models based on Free Software, since they are not selling the software, they are selling services related to the software. It is as if you were to give out remote control's that had parts governed by patents and selling a manual on how to use it.
In then end I came to one conclusion that I think may warrant further debate: Software patents should not apply to Free Software. Businesses are still protected from each other, which is what really matters. And Free Software is still allowed to grow and prosper. What do you think?

Monday, May 08, 2006

Interesting Support Model for OSS Dev's

I saw an article on slashdot/eweek about a really neat and innovative way of getting support for free and open source software through the developers themselves. The basic idea is the company, OpenLogic, who provides Enterprise-level support, will pay experts in a particular FOSS project to handle high level support requests. The company is calling this initiative the Expert Community Program. I think this is a very smart way of providing quality support. On the one hand, FOSS support companies are limited in their technical knowledge, and FOSS developers are limited in their ability to directly support enterprise-level users.

The full article can be found here.